Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Soundfindr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
50
Highlights
41
Differences
8
Reactions
0
Likes
Rode Procaster
vs
Electro Voice RE320:
50 Highlights & 41 Differences —
So, Which Microphone Actually Works Better
Affordability meets essentials in Rode Procaster. RE320 caters to professionals wanting expanded control and smart features.
Trying to decide between Rode Procaster and Electro Voice RE320? This microphones face-off covers tone, controls, design, and key multi-pattern switching, series/line, wireless technology & mute function that musicians care about.
Rode Procaster vs Electro Voice RE320: Professional Dynamic Mic Showdown
When it comes to high-quality dynamic microphones tailored for podcasting, broadcasting, and professional audio capture, the Rode Procaster and the Electro Voice RE320 stand out as two prominent contenders. Both microphones share a common dynamic microphone design with a large diaphragm and utilize a cardioid polar pattern, making them excellent at isolating the voice source and reducing background noise interference. They connect via wired XLR with balanced output, ideal for professional mixer and audio interface setups.
However, their target uses and internal technologies diverge. The Rode Procaster is primarily built for desktop podcast and broadcast setups, boasting a transformerless design focused on clarity and durability, with essential accessories included. In contrast, the Electro Voice RE320 is a more versatile unit suited not only for broadcast but also for studio and live instrument applications, featuring transformer-based circuitry, onboard controls, and advanced monitoring options. These differences speak to varied user needs, from straightforward voice recording to more complex multi-environment audio production.
Strengths of the Rode Procaster: Solid Simplicity for Professional Podcasting
The Rode Procaster has carved a niche by offering a robust metal build with a matte finish and comes bundled with useful extras such as a pop filter, shock mount, and a carrying case; valuable additions for podcasters and broadcasters wanting an all-in-one package. Its transformerless setup delivers clear audio reproduction without the warm coloration usually associated with transformer mics, making it ideal for spoken word clarity.
Dimensionally, it sports a convenient desktop form factor that fits nicely on broadcasting desks, and a moderate cardioid pattern that focuses on voice capture while minimizing ambient noise. While it does not have onboard controls or advanced voice isolation features, its simple design translates to fewer points of failure and straightforward operation.
Notably, the Procaster offers a very competitive 10-year warranty, providing peace of mind for long-term professional use. It excels in maintaining solid voice isolation thanks to its directional unidirectional design, and the included mounting and adapter accessories support flexible desktop deployment.
Advantages of the Electro Voice RE320: Versatility Meets Advanced Controls
The Electro Voice RE320 is designed for users requiring a broader range of applications: studio recordings, live performances, podcasting, and instrument miking, all rolled into one. It impresses with a wider frequency response starting at 30 Hz (compared to Procaster's 75 Hz), catering to deeper and fuller audio capture.
Its transformer-based large diaphragm capsule introduces a warmer tonal character, preferred in music and broadcast environments. Furthermore, the RE320 shines with advanced features like voice isolation and proximity effect control, allowing users to maintain consistent sound quality regardless of mic distance. These are complemented by onboard mute and gain controls, along with headphone monitoring and monitoring mix control; features rarely found in mics at this level.
The RE320 is forged with a tough steel body and includes rubberized internal dampening material and a neodymium magnet, enhancing durability and sound quality consistency even in rugged environments. Its standard 5/8" mounting thread supports boom arm setups favored by professional broadcasters and live performers alike. Moreover, it has a dedicated ground lift switch and robust shielding to guard against RF interference, ideal for complex studio environments.
Additionally, the RE320 supports smart assistant compatibility for Alexa and Google Assistant, reflecting modern integration needs.
Quick Take
The Rode Procaster offers a straightforward, reliable microphone built for podcasting and broadcasting with an excellent accessory bundle and a long warranty, making it a trusted choice for focused voice applications. Meanwhile, the Electro Voice RE320 impresses with its flexible usage scenarios, enhanced onboard controls, and sophisticated sound tuning capabilities designed for professional audio environments demanding the utmost in performance.
Bottom Line
Choosing between these microphones depends largely on your specific use case and budget. The Rode Procaster stands out for podcasters and broadcasters seeking a no-nonsense, sturdy desktop mic with crucial accessories included, all at a value-conscious price point around $220.4 at amazon.com. If your workflow spans broader audio applications, including live music, instrument recording, or studio sessions, and you want advanced controls plus monitoring features, the Electro Voice RE320's features justify its higher investment near $314.9 at amazon.com.
Verdict
Winner: Rode Procaster - Outstanding value with essential podcasting features, solid durability, and five key accessories included, making it perfect for broadcasters and podcasters who want quality without complexity.
Runner-up: Electro Voice RE320 - Superior versatility, wider frequency range, smart onboard controls, and better noise handling make it ideal for advanced users juggling multiple pro audio scenarios.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
Can’t decide between Rode Procaster and Electro Voice RE320? We compared their key music features, hidden gems, pros and cons, and price-to-value for each microphone.
Rode Procaster is intended for Podcast, Broadcast, and Streaming, while Electro Voice RE320 has a broader Intended Use including Studio, Live, Podcast, Broadcast, Instrument, and Streaming, offering more versatility.
Describes the primary application area.
In the battle of Intended Use,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Intended Use,
Rode Procaster ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
The RE320's broader intended use, including studio and instrument miking, makes it way more versatile. The Procaster is a bit too specific for my needs.
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Identifies the product line or collection the microphone belongs to.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Series/Line on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Product Type
What is the product type?
35
Rode Procaster
0Votes
Dynamic
67
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
Dynamic
vs
Product Type
The Product Type for Rode Procaster is Dynamic and for Electro Voice RE320 it is also Dynamic. Both microphones share the same microphone technology, suitable for various professional applications.
Defines the basic category of the microphone.
In the battle of Product Type,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
32 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Type on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Model Name
What is the model name?
57
Rode Procaster
0Votes
Procaster
54
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
RE320
Rode Procaster
The model name is Procaster, recognized for professional voice recording. It is widely used in broadcasting and podcast studios.
Electro Voice RE320
The RE320 is a versatile microphone designed for both professional recording and live sound, making it a popular choice in studios and for broadcasters.
The specific product identifier from the manufacturer.
In the battle of Model Name,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
better than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Model Name on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Country of Origin
What is the country of origin?
50
Rode Procaster
0Votes
Australia
87
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
United States
Rode Procaster
Manufactured in Australia, ensuring high-quality standards. Australian production is known for durability and reliable performance.
Electro Voice RE320
Manufactured in the United States, the RE320 is a product of Electro-Voice's long history of quality audio equipment.
Manufacturing or design origin.
In the battle of Country of Origin,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
37 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Country of Origin on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Compatibility
Which devices or platforms are compatible?
25
Rode Procaster
0Votes
Mixer, Audio Interface
19
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
Mixer, Audio Interface, PA System
vs
Compatibility
Compatibility for Rode Procaster includes Mixer and Audio Interface; Electro Voice RE320 adds PA System compatibility, providing more usage scenarios for the RE320.
Lists supported platforms and devices.
In the battle of Compatibility,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
better than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
higher
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Compatibility on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Form Factor
What is the form factor?
55
Rode Procaster
0Votes
Desktop
57
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
Handheld
Rode Procaster
This microphone is meant to sit on a desk or desktop stand. It is not handheld, making it stable for long recording sessions.
Electro Voice RE320
The handheld design provides flexibility for dynamic use, such as live performances or on-the-go recording.
Describes the physical style of the microphone.
In the battle of Form Factor,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Form Factor on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Polar Pattern Type
What is the polar pattern type?
65
Rode Procaster
0Votes
Cardioid
67
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
Cardioid
Rode Procaster
The cardioid pattern focuses on sound from the front while rejecting side and rear noise. This ensures clear voice capture with minimal background interference.
Electro Voice RE320
The cardioid pattern helps isolate sound from the front, minimizing background noise from the sides and rear, making it ideal for live settings.
Identifies the default pickup pattern.
In the battle of Polar Pattern Type,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Polar Pattern Type on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Connectivity Type
What is the connectivity type?
40
Rode Procaster
0Votes
Wired, XLR
47
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
XLR
Rode Procaster
The Procaster uses a wired XLR connection for balanced audio output. This provides reliable, interference-free sound for professional recordings.
Electro Voice RE320
The XLR connection provides a reliable, professional-grade signal, ensuring a clear and uninterrupted audio feed for recordings or live sound.
Defines how the microphone connects to devices.
In the battle of Connectivity Type,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connectivity Type on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Color Options
What are the color options?
35
Rode Procaster
0Votes
Black
47
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
Black
vs
Color Options
Color Options for both Rode Procaster and Electro Voice RE320 are Black, suitable for professional settings.
Available product colors.
In the battle of Color Options,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Color Options on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
It includes a clip for mounting on stands or boom arms. This allows flexible positioning for desktops or broadcast desks.
Electro Voice RE320
The RE320 is compatible with a variety of mounting options, allowing for stable, versatile placement during use.
The typical mounting or support style.
In the battle of Mounting Type,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Type on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Age Group
What is the age group?
80
Rode Procaster
0Votes
Professional, Adult
77
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
Adult, Professional
vs
Age Group
Age Group for Rode Procaster is Professional and Adult; Electro Voice RE320 also targets Adult and Professional users, signaling professional-grade devices.
The intended user age bracket.
In the battle of Age Group,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
better than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Age Group on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Excellent for spoken-word recordings like podcasts and broadcasts. It ensures a natural and full vocal sound.
Electro Voice RE320
Whether in the studio, on stage, or for online content creation, the RE320 excels in capturing high-quality sound for a range of applications.
Specific contexts where the mic is best suited.
In the battle of Recording Application Category,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
better than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
higher
14 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recording Application Category on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
User Skill Level
What is the user skill level?
95
Rode Procaster
0Votes
Professional
72
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
Intermediate, Professional
Rode Procaster
Designed for professionals with knowledge of audio interfaces. Beginners may need guidance to get optimal results.
Electro Voice RE320
Best suited for intermediate and professional users, the RE320 provides the versatility and durability needed for high-level audio work.
Recommended audience expertise level.
In the battle of User Skill Level,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
better than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
higher
23 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Skill Level on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Launch Region
Where is it available?
95
Rode Procaster
0Votes
Global
97
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
Global
Rode Procaster
Sold worldwide, meeting international broadcast standards. It is trusted in studios across different countries.
Electro Voice RE320
Available worldwide, the RE320 serves a global audience, ensuring accessibility for users across different regions.
Where the product is primarily available.
In the battle of Launch Region,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Launch Region on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Limited Edition
Is it a limited/special edition?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Rode Procaster
This is a standard production model, not a limited edition. Units are readily available for purchase.
Electro Voice RE320
The RE320 is a standard production model, offering long-term availability and support for users.
Whether the model is a limited or special release.
In the battle of Limited Edition,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Limited Edition on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Year of Release
What year was it released?
49
Rode Procaster
0Votes
2009
55
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
2011
vs
Year of Release
The Year of Release for Rode Procaster is 2009, whereas the Electro Voice RE320 was released in 2011. The RE320 is a newer model by 2 years, which might imply newer features or design improvements.
Indicates when the microphone was launched.
In the battle of Year of Release,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Year of Release on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
The microphone weighs roughly 0.68 kg. This makes it stable on desk stands but still portable for setups.
Electro Voice RE320
Weighing 1.5 lbs (680 grams), the RE320 is lightweight, making it easy to handle and mount while still feeling robust.
The microphone’s physical weight.
In the battle of Weight,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
equal
1.50 lbs
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Weight on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Width
What is the width?
2.09
inch
0Votes
2.14
inch
0Votes
Rode Procaster
The microphone width is approximately 5.3 cm. This compact width allows it to fit easily on most desktop mounts.
Electro Voice RE320
The RE320’s width of 2.14 inches (5.43 cm) makes it compact and easy to handle during live events or in the studio.
The microphone’s overall width.
In the battle of Width,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
better than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
0.1 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Depth
What is the depth?
2.09
inch
0Votes
1.94
inch
0Votes
Rode Procaster
Depth matches the width at about 5.3 cm. The cylindrical body ensures consistent handling and mounting.
Electro Voice RE320
The 1.94-inch (4.93 cm) depth gives the RE320 a streamlined profile, perfect for handheld use or mounting on a stand.
The microphone’s overall depth.
In the battle of Depth,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
higher
0.2 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Height
What is the height?
8.43
inch
0Votes
8.53
inch
0Votes
Rode Procaster
The mic height is roughly 21.4 cm, about the length of a standard water bottle. It fits well on desk or stand mounts without crowding the workspace.
Electro Voice RE320
With a height of 8.53 inches (21.68 cm), this microphone provides an optimal size for easy handling and placement.
The microphone’s overall height.
In the battle of Height,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
better than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
0.1 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Height on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Width
What is the package width?
5.5
inch
0Votes
11.85
inch
0Votes
Rode Procaster
Package width is approximately 14 cm. It is compact for shipping and storage.
Electro Voice RE320
The package width of 11.85 inches (30.1 cm) ensures the microphone and its accessories are well-protected during transit.
The shipping package’s width.
In the battle of Package Width,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
better than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
6.4 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Width on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Depth
What is the package depth?
2.6
inch
0Votes
5.55
inch
0Votes
Rode Procaster
Package depth is around 6.6 cm. The box is lightweight and easy to carry.
Electro Voice RE320
Measuring 5.55 inches (14.1 cm) in depth, the package efficiently houses the microphone and its included accessories.
The shipping package’s depth.
In the battle of Package Depth,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
better than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
3.0 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Depth on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Height
What is the package height?
11.25
inch
0Votes
3.5
inch
0Votes
Rode Procaster
Package height is about 28.6 cm. It fits easily on shelves or in storage compartments.
Electro Voice RE320
The 3.5-inch (8.9 cm) height of the package ensures a compact and safe shipping box for the RE320.
The shipping package’s height.
In the battle of Package Height,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
higher
7.8 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Height on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Diameter
What is the capsule diameter?
2.09
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Rode Procaster
The capsule is about 5.3 cm in diameter. A large diaphragm improves richness and warmth in vocal recordings.
The diameter of the microphone capsule.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Diameter on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Thread Size
What is the mounting thread size?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
87
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
5/8"
Electro Voice RE320
The 5/8" thread size allows compatibility with most standard microphone stands and boom arms, offering flexible mounting options.
The thread size for mounting compatibility.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Thread Size on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Length
What is the cable length?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Length of the included or integrated cable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Length on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Stand/Arm Length
What is the stand/arm length?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum length of included stand or boom arm.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stand/Arm Length on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Length
What is the capsule length?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The length of the microphone capsule.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Length on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Grill Diameter
What is the grill diameter?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The diameter of the protective microphone grill.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grill Diameter on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Base Footprint Diameter
What is the base/stand footprint diameter?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Diameter of the microphone base or stand footprint.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Base Footprint Diameter on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Rating for rejecting ambient noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Describes the built-in preamp’s fidelity.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Preamp Quality on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Frequency Response (Min)
What is the minimum frequency response?
75
Hz
0Votes
30
Hz
1Votes
vs
Frequency Response (Min)
Frequency Response (Min) is 75 Hz for Procaster and 30 Hz for RE320, with RE320 offering a wider lower frequency range beneficial for bass capture.
The lowest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Min),
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
higher
45.0 Hz
measurement.
Based on community votes for Frequency Response (Min),
Rode Procaster ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
I'm definitely leaning towards the RE320 here because of its transformer design. I appreciate the warmer tonal character it tends to produce for my sound.
See more
Capsule Type
What is the capsule type?
65
Rode Procaster
0Votes
Large Diaphragm
67
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
Large Diaphragm
Rode Procaster
A large diaphragm captures full, rich vocals. It ensures professional-quality voice reproduction.
Electro Voice RE320
The large diaphragm design enhances the microphone’s ability to capture detailed sound across a wide frequency range.
Specifies the capsule style that influences sound capture.
In the battle of Capsule Type,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Type on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Frequency Response (Max)
What is the maximum frequency response?
18,000
Hz
0Votes
18,000
Hz
0Votes
vs
Frequency Response (Max)
Frequency Response (Max) is equal at 18,000 Hz for both microphones, covering a broad audio spectrum.
The highest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Max),
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
equal
18,000.00 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Frequency Response (Max) on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Sensitivity
What is the sensitivity?
-56
dBV/Pa
0Votes
-52
dBV/Pa
0Votes
vs
Sensitivity
Sensitivity is -56 dBV/Pa for Procaster and -52 dBV/Pa for RE320; RE320 is more sensitive by 4 dB, picking up quieter sounds better.
Output level relative to sound pressure.
In the battle of Sensitivity,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
4.0 dBV/Pa
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensitivity on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Directionality
What is the directionality?
15
Rode Procaster
0Votes
Unidirectional
37
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
Unidirectional
Rode Procaster
The mic picks up sound primarily from the front. Side and rear noise are minimized for focused recording.
Electro Voice RE320
The unidirectional cardioid pattern is ideal for isolating sound from the front, making it perfect for focused recording or live sound applications.
General pickup orientation.
In the battle of Directionality,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
22 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Directionality on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Impedance
What is the output impedance?
320
ohm
0Votes
150
ohm
0Votes
Rode Procaster
Output impedance is 320 Ω, standard for professional mics. It works well with mixers and interfaces without impedance mismatch.
Electro Voice RE320
The RE320's 150-ohm impedance is balanced, reducing the risk of signal loss and ensuring compatibility with professional audio equipment.
Electrical resistance of the microphone’s output.
In the battle of Output Impedance,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
higher
170.0 ohm
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Impedance on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Stereo/Mono Mode
What mode is supported?
25
Rode Procaster
0Votes
Mono
17
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
Mono
Rode Procaster
The output is mono, capturing a single channel. This is ideal for voice clarity and broadcast compatibility.
Electro Voice RE320
The RE320 records in mono, providing clear, single-source audio ideal for vocals and individual instruments.
Determines recording mode.
In the battle of Stereo/Mono Mode,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
better than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stereo/Mono Mode on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Proximity Effect Control
Does it have proximity effect control?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
Yes
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
vs
Proximity Effect Control
Proximity Effect Control is No on Procaster and Yes on RE320, beneficial for RE320 users to reduce bass boost when close to the microphone.
Whether it has control for bass buildup at close range.
In the battle of Proximity Effect Control,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Proximity Effect Control on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Microphone Type
What is the microphone type?
25
Rode Procaster
0Votes
Dynamic
87
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
Dynamic
vs
Microphone Type
Microphone Type is Dynamic for both Rode Procaster and Electro Voice RE320, suitable for high sound pressure levels and durability.
Defines the operating principle of the microphone.
In the battle of Microphone Type,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
62 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Microphone Type on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Principle
What is the acoustic principle?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
67
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
Pressure Gradient
Electro Voice RE320
This design helps capture accurate sound, especially for transient-rich sources like drums, without picking up unwanted background noise.
The underlying sound capture mechanism.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Principle on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Transient Response
What is the transient response?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
97
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
Fast
vs
Transient Response
Transient Response is unreported for Procaster but Fast for RE320, indicating quicker response to rapid sound changes for RE320.
Ability to capture sudden sound changes.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Transient Response on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Signal-to-Noise Ratio
What is the SNR?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The clarity ratio between signal and background noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Dynamic Range
What is the dynamic range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The range between quietest and loudest sounds captured.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dynamic Range on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Minimum Terminating Impedance
What is the minimum terminating impedance?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The minimum load impedance required for optimal microphone performance and to avoid signal distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Minimum Terminating Impedance on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Max SPL
What is the maximum SPL?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The maximum loudness before distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Max SPL on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Equivalent Noise Level
What is the equivalent noise level?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The self-noise generated by the microphone.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Equivalent Noise Level on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
THD
What is the THD (total Harmonic Distortion)?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Distortion added at high volumes.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
THD on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Pre-Attenuation Pad
What is the pre-attenuation pad?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Built-in reduction for handling loud signals.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pre-Attenuation Pad on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Low-Cut Filter
What is the low-cut filter cutoff?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Removes low-end rumble.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low-Cut Filter on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Off-Axis Rejection
What is the off-axis rejection?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Sensitivity drop when sound comes from the side/rear.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Off-Axis Rejection on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Overload Point
What is the overload point?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The SPL level where overload occurs.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overload Point on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Polar Pattern Switching Precision
What is the switching precision?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The accuracy of selectable polar patterns.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Polar Pattern Switching Precision on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Level
What is the output level?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The output voltage relative to input pressure.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Level on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The wireless system type used.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Technology on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Balanced/Unbalanced Output is Balanced for both, ensuring noise reduction in professional audio setups.
Defines the type of electrical signal output.
In the battle of Balanced/Unbalanced Output,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Balanced/Unbalanced Output on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Dual Output Capability,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dual Output Capability on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
XLR Pin Configuration is Standard for both, ensuring compatibility with common professional audio gear.
Specifies XLR wiring configuration.
In the battle of XLR Pin Configuration,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
better than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
higher
68 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
XLR Pin Configuration on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates built-in protection against RF interference.
In the battle of Shielding Against RF Interference,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Shielding Against RF Interference on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Connection Interface
What is the connection interface?
25
Rode Procaster
0Votes
XLR
37
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
XLR
Electro Voice RE320
The RE320 uses an XLR connection for professional audio equipment, ensuring optimal signal quality.
Defines the main interface for connectivity.
In the battle of Connection Interface,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connection Interface on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Detachable
Is the cable detachable?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
vs
Cable Detachable
Cable Detachable feature is No for both mics, meaning cables are fixed, potentially affecting portability.
Whether the cable can be detached or replaced.
In the battle of Cable Detachable,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Detachable on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Audio Output Options
What are the audio output options?
45
Rode Procaster
0Votes
Balanced
42
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
Analog, Balanced
vs
Audio Output Options
Audio Output Options for Procaster is Balanced; RE320 offers Analog and Balanced, arguably providing more versatility in output choices.
Lists output signal formats available.
In the battle of Audio Output Options,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
better than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Audio Output Options on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Phantom Power Support
Does it support phantom power?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Electro Voice RE320
The RE320 operates passively and does not require phantom power, making it compatible with a wide range of audio devices.
Whether the mic supports phantom power.
In the battle of Phantom Power Support,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Phantom Power Support on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Ground Lift Switch
Does it have a ground lift switch?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
Yes
1Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Prevents ground loop hum in audio systems.
In the battle of Ground Lift Switch,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Based on community votes for Ground Lift Switch,
Rode Procaster ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
A ground lift switch is a must-have for studio environments to deal with hum. The RE320 offers this crucial feature while the Procaster doesn't.
See more
Bluetooth Version
What Bluetooth version does it support?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Version of Bluetooth supported (if applicable).
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Bluetooth Version on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
RF Frequency Range
What is the RF frequency range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Frequency spectrum range for mics.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
RF Frequency Range on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
USB Compatibility
What USB versions are compatible?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Identifies supported USB standards.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Compatibility on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Interface Latency
What is the interface latency?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Latency introduced by the interface.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Interface Latency on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Device Pairing
Does it support multi-device pairing?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
vs
Multi-Device Pairing
Multi-Device Pairing is unavailable on both devices, not supporting wireless pairing.
Ability to connect to multiple devices simultaneously.
In the battle of Multi-Device Pairing,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Device Pairing on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
How long the microphone operates per charge.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Life on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Source
What is the power source?
15
Rode Procaster
0Votes
Passive
27
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
Passive
Electro Voice RE320
The RE320 is a passive dynamic microphone, so it does not require any external power or phantom power to operate. This makes it highly versatile and reliable for both studio and live applications, as it can be connected directly to standard XLR inputs without worrying about power sources.
Defines how the microphone is powered.
In the battle of Power Source,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Source on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Phantom Power Requirement
What is the phantom power requirement?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the phantom power voltage needed.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Phantom Power Requirement on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Type
What is the battery type?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The type of battery used if portable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Type on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Recharge Time
What is the recharge time?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Time required to fully recharge the battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recharge Time on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Consumption
What is the power consumption?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Amount of power drawn during use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Consumption on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Power-Off
Does it have auto power-off?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Whether the microphone shuts down automatically when idle.
In the battle of Auto Power-Off,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Power-Off on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Method
What is the charging method?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The interface used for recharging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Method on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Replaceable Battery Support
Does it support replaceable batteries?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
vs
Replaceable Battery Support
Replaceable Battery Support is No for both microphones.
Indicates if batteries can be swapped.
In the battle of Replaceable Battery Support,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replaceable Battery Support on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
External Power Supply Compatibility
Is it compatible with an external power supply?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Can the mic run on external AC/DC supply.
In the battle of External Power Supply Compatibility,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
External Power Supply Compatibility on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Indicator Light
Does it have a power indicator light?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
vs
Power Indicator Light
Power Indicator Light is No on both mics.
Whether a light shows power/battery status.
In the battle of Power Indicator Light,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Indicator Light on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Having headphone monitoring on the RE320 is super convenient for real-time adjustments. It's a critical feature that the Procaster is missing for my workflow.
See more
Onboard Controls
What onboard controls are available?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Types of direct physical controls.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Onboard Controls on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
On/Off Switch
Does it include an on/off switch?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Whether the microphone includes a physical on/off switch.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
On/Off Switch on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Monitoring Mix Control
Does it have monitoring mix control?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
Yes
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
vs
Monitoring Mix Control
Monitoring Mix Control is No for Procaster and Yes for RE320, enhancing monitoring flexibility for RE320.
Lets user adjust mic vs playback audio mix.
In the battle of Monitoring Mix Control,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Monitoring Mix Control on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Touch/Motion Controls
Does it support touch/motion controls?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Allows interaction via touch gestures or motion.
In the battle of Touch/Motion Controls,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Touch/Motion Controls on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
LED Indicator Lights
Does it have LED indicators?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Lights that show status such as mute, levels, or power.
In the battle of LED Indicator Lights,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
LED Indicator Lights on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
App/Software Integration
Is it integrated with software/apps?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Works with companion apps or software.
In the battle of App/Software Integration,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
App/Software Integration on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
EQ Presets
Does it have EQ presets?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
vs
EQ Presets
EQ Presets are no on both mics.
Pre-configured equalization modes.
In the battle of EQ Presets,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
EQ Presets on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Effects
Does it include voice effects?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Built-in voice modulation effects.
In the battle of Voice Effects,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Effects on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Feedback Suppression
Does it have feedback suppression?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Prevents audio feedback loops in live use.
In the battle of Feedback Suppression,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Feedback Suppression on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Automatic Gain Adjustment
Does it support automatic gain adjustment?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Auto-adjusts mic gain for consistent output.
In the battle of Automatic Gain Adjustment,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Automatic Gain Adjustment on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Mode Switch
Does the microphone have a multi-mode switch?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Shows whether the microphone includes a switch to toggle between different recording modes or polar patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Mode Switch,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Mode Switch on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
One-touch Recording Button
Does it have a one-touch recording button?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
A single button to start recording instantly.
In the battle of One-touch Recording Button,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
One-touch Recording Button on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Programmable Button Functions
Can buttons be programmed?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Allows customizing buttons to user preference.
In the battle of Programmable Button Functions,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Programmable Button Functions on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Sensitivity Preset Profiles
Does it have sensitivity presets?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Predefined sensitivity levels for various uses.
In the battle of Sensitivity Preset Profiles,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensitivity Preset Profiles on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
The fact that the Rode Procaster includes a shock mount is awesome. It saves me the trouble of buying one separately and ensures clean audio.
See more
Body Material
What is the body material?
55
Rode Procaster
0Votes
Metal
67
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
Steel
The main structural material of the microphone body.
In the battle of Body Material,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Body Material on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Finish/Coating
What finish/coating does it have?
75
Rode Procaster
0Votes
Matte
42
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
Glossy
Exterior treatment or surface finish.
In the battle of Finish/Coating,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
better than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
higher
33 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Finish/Coating on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Windscreen
Is a windscreen included?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Whether a windscreen is included for wind noise control.
In the battle of Windscreen,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Windscreen on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Water Resistance
Is it water resistant?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Indicates if the mic is resistant to water.
In the battle of Water Resistance,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Water Resistance on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Dust Resistance
Is it dust resistant?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
vs
Dust Resistance
Dust Resistance is No on both microphones.
Indicates if the mic is resistant to dust.
In the battle of Dust Resistance,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dust Resistance on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Drop Resistance
Is it drop resistant?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Indicates if the mic is designed to survive accidental drops.
In the battle of Drop Resistance,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Drop Resistance on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Adjustable Arm/Stand
Does it have an adjustable arm/stand?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
vs
Adjustable Arm/Stand
Adjustable Arm/Stand is No on both microphones.
Whether the arm/stand can be adjusted.
In the battle of Adjustable Arm/Stand,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adjustable Arm/Stand on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Detachable Mount
Is the mount detachable?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
vs
Detachable Mount
Detachable Mount is No for both.
If the mount can be detached for flexibility.
In the battle of Detachable Mount,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Detachable Mount on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Swivel/Pivot Capability
Does it have swivel/pivot capability?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
vs
Swivel/Pivot Capability
Swivel/Pivot Capability is No on both microphones.
Whether the microphone head or stand can rotate.
In the battle of Swivel/Pivot Capability,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Swivel/Pivot Capability on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Foldable Design
Is it foldable?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Indicates if the mic or its stand can fold for portability.
In the battle of Foldable Design,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Foldable Design on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Grill Material
What is the grill material?
75
Rode Procaster
0Votes
Steel
77
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
Steel
vs
Grill Material
Grill Material is Steel on both models, providing robust protection for the microphone capsule.
The material of the protective mic grill.
In the battle of Grill Material,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grill Material on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Dampening Material
What is the internal dampening material?
65
Rode Procaster
0Votes
Foam
82
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
Rubberized
The material used internally to reduce noise/vibration.
In the battle of Internal Dampening Material,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
17 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Dampening Material on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Resistance Rating
What is the heat resistance rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum heat level the mic can withstand.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Resistance Rating on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Corrosion Resistance
Is it corrosion resistant?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
Yes
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Indicates if materials resist corrosion.
In the battle of Corrosion Resistance,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Corrosion Resistance on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Neodymium Magnet
Does it use a neodymium magnet?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
Yes
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
States whether the capsule uses a neodymium magnet for stability.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Neodymium Magnet on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Shockmount
Is there an internal shockmount for the capsule?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Capsule isolation that reduces handling noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Shockmount on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Whether a manual or quick-start guide is included.
In the battle of Instruction Manual,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Instruction Manual on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
50
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
WSPL-2
Manufacturer-recommended windshield model.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Optional Windshield Model on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Stand/Tripod
Is a stand/tripod included?
Yes
0Votes
Rode Procaster
Yes
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Whether a stand or tripod is included in the box.
In the battle of Stand/Tripod,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stand/Tripod on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Cables
Are cables included?
Yes
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Indicates if connecting cables are provided.
In the battle of Cables,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
better than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
higher
37 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cables on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Carrying Case
Is there a carrying case included?
Yes
0Votes
Rode Procaster
Yes
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Whether a protective carrying case is part of the package.
In the battle of Carrying Case,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Carrying Case on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Adapters
Are adapters included?
Yes
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
vs
Adapters
Adapters are included with Procaster but not with RE320, potentially adding cost for RE320 users.
States if adapter(s) are included (e.g., XLR to 3.5mm).
In the battle of Adapters,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
better than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
higher
37 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adapters on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Clip
Is a mounting clip included?
Yes
0Votes
Rode Procaster
Yes
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Whether a clip for attaching to stands/instruments is included.
In the battle of Mounting Clip,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Clip on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Packaging Type
What is the packaging type?
25
Rode Procaster
0Votes
Box
47
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
Box
vs
Packaging Type
Packaging Type is Box for both products.
Defines how the product is packaged.
In the battle of Packaging Type,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
22 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Packaging Type on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Spare Parts Availability
Are spare parts available?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Whether the manufacturer provides replacement parts.
In the battle of Spare Parts Availability,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Spare Parts Availability on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Stickers/Branding
Are stickers/branding included?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
Yes
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
vs
Stickers/Branding
Stickers/Branding is No for Procaster but Yes for RE320, offering more marketing or decorative options.
Indicates if stickers or branded items are in the package.
In the battle of Stickers/Branding,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stickers/Branding on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty Card
Is a warranty card included?
Yes
0Votes
Rode Procaster
Yes
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
vs
Warranty Card
Warranty Card is included with both microphones.
Whether a warranty card is included.
In the battle of Warranty Card,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty Card on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Protective Foam Insert
Is protective foam included?
Yes
0Votes
Rode Procaster
Yes
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Indicates if protective foam is part of packaging.
In the battle of Protective Foam Insert,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protective Foam Insert on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
That 10-year warranty on the Procaster is super reassuring, ngl. It really shows Rode stands by their product for the long haul.
See more
Safety Compliance
Is it safety compliant?
Yes
0Votes
Rode Procaster
Yes
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Indicates adherence to safety regulations.
In the battle of Safety Compliance,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Compliance on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Environmental Compliance
Is it environmentally compliant?
Yes
0Votes
Rode Procaster
Yes
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
vs
Environmental Compliance
Environmental Compliance is confirmed for both microphones.
Compliance with eco/environmental regulations.
In the battle of Environmental Compliance,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Compliance on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
FCC/CE Approval
Is it FCC/CE approved?
Yes
0Votes
Rode Procaster
Yes
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Explicit FCC/CE compliance approval.
In the battle of FCC/CE Approval,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
FCC/CE Approval on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Professional Broadcast Certification
Is it broadcast certified?
Yes
0Votes
Rode Procaster
Yes
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Indicates if the mic meets pro broadcast standards.
In the battle of Professional Broadcast Certification,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Professional Broadcast Certification on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Range (Operating)
What is the operating temperature range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Operating temperature window for reliable use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Range (Operating) on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Ability to switch between multiple pickup patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Pattern Switching,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Pattern Switching on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Ability to capture immersive 360° or surround sound.
In the battle of Surround Capture Mode,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surround Capture Mode on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode Procaster
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
90
Electro Voice RE320
0Votes
Alexa, Google Assistant
vs
Smart Assistant Compatibility
Smart Assistant Compatibility is unavailable for Procaster, but RE320 supports Alexa and Google Assistant, providing modern smart integration.
Integration with voice assistants.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Assistant Compatibility on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Firmware Upgrade Support,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgrade Support on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
DSP Processing
Does it include DSP processing?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Built-in digital signal processing for sound shaping.
In the battle of DSP Processing,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
DSP Processing on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
AI Noise Cancellation
Does it feature AI noise cancellation?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
vs
AI Noise Cancellation
AI Noise Cancellation is unavailable on both.
AI-powered suppression of background noise.
In the battle of AI Noise Cancellation,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
AI Noise Cancellation on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Beamforming Technology
Does it support beamforming?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Uses mic arrays to focus on sound sources.
In the battle of Beamforming Technology,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Beamforming Technology on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Tracking
Does it include voice tracking?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Automatically follows speaker’s voice.
In the battle of Voice Tracking,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Tracking on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Recording Profiles
Does it have recording profiles?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Predefined sound settings for specific uses.
In the battle of Recording Profiles,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recording Profiles on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Calibration
Does it support auto calibration?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Automatically adjusts mic response to environment.
In the battle of Auto Calibration,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Calibration on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Low Latency Monitoring
Does it support low-latency monitoring?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
Yes
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
vs
Low Latency Monitoring
Low Latency Monitoring is No for Procaster and Yes for RE320, benefiting RE320 users with real-time audio monitoring.
Provides near real-time monitoring with minimal delay.
In the battle of Low Latency Monitoring,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
worse than
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low Latency Monitoring on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Cloud Profile Storage
Does it support cloud profile storage?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
vs
Cloud Profile Storage
Cloud Profile Storage is not supported on either microphone.
Saves mic settings to the cloud.
In the battle of Cloud Profile Storage,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cloud Profile Storage on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation
Does it feature acoustic modeling?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
vs
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation is not available on either.
Simulates room acoustics or mic characteristics.
In the battle of Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Capsule Blending
Does it support dual capsule blending?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
No
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
vs
Dual Capsule Blending
Dual Capsule Blending is not present on either microphone.
Blends outputs of dual capsules for tonal flexibility.
In the battle of Dual Capsule Blending,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dual Capsule Blending on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Hum-Compensating Coil
Does it have a hum-compensating coil?
No
0Votes
Rode Procaster
Yes
0Votes
Electro Voice RE320
Indicates if the mic includes a humbucking coil to reduce electrical interference.
In the battle of Hum-Compensating Coil,
Rode Procaster ◉ is
same as
Electro Voice RE320 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Hum-Compensating Coil on Rode Procaster ◉
vs Electro Voice RE320 ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Sound Quality
How would you rate the sound quality of this microphone?
Crisp and professional
0Votes
0Votes
Good and clear
0Votes
0Votes
Average clarity
0Votes
0Votes
Distorted and unclear
0Votes
0Votes
Noise Handling
How well does this microphone handle background noise?
Blocks out most noise
0Votes
0Votes
Handles noise fairly well
0Votes
0Votes
Reduces some noise
0Votes
0Votes
Picks up everything
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Life
How long does the battery last on this microphone?
Excellent — Over 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Long lasting — 10 to 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Decent — 5 to 10 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Short — 2 to 5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very short — Under 2 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Durability
How durable is this microphone based on build and lifespan?
Highly durable — Over 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Solid — 2 to 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Average — 1 to 2 years
0Votes
0Votes
Very fragile — Less than 1 year
0Votes
0Votes
Weight
How heavy is this microphone?
Ultra-light — Under 150 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Lightweight — 150 to 300 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Medium — 300 to 500 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Heavy — 500 to 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Very heavy — Over 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Design Appeal
How attractive is the design of this microphone?
Plain and boring
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat okay
0Votes
0Votes
Nice looking
0Votes
0Votes
Stylish and modern
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing
How do you feel about the price of this microphone?
Great value for money
0Votes
0Votes
Pretty good price
0Votes
0Votes
Fair deal
0Votes
0Votes
Kinda pricey
0Votes
0Votes
Crazy expensive
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitivity
How sensitive is this microphone to capturing sound?
Very sensitive — Detects quiet sounds clearly
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitive — Captures a wide sound range
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate — Picks up normal voice levels well
0Votes
0Votes
Low — Needs to be close to sound source
0Votes
0Votes
Very low — Struggles to capture soft voices
0Votes
0Votes
Frequency Response Range
What do you think about the frequency response range of this microphone?
Wide range — 20 Hz to 20 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Good range — 30 Hz to 18 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Decent range — 40 Hz to 16 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Limited range — 50 Hz to 14 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Narrow range — Above 60 Hz only
0Votes
0Votes
Connectivity
How stable and reliable is the connection of this microphone?
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
0
Cartling
